Termout.org logo/LING


Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled.

Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) argument structure (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística

1) Candidate: argument structure


Is in goldstandard

1
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines201 - : El volumen completo está dedicado a Ken Hale, cuya muerte en octubre de 2001 conmovió a un conjunto amplio de estudiosos alrededor del mundo. El texto se divide en tres partes. La primera, denominada From lexical roots to syntax contiene tres artículos. El primero de ellos es un artículo clásico de los profesores del MIT (Massachussets Institute of Technology), Ken Hale y Samuel Jay Keyser, quienes expandieron las bases de la gramática generativa a una teoría donde el papel del léxico y la estructura argumental cobran mayor relevancia. El capítulo, denominado Aspect and the syntax of argument structure es una síntesis del único libro publicado por ambos autores en el 2002, Prolegomenon to a theory of lexical argument structure (Hale & Keyser, 2002 ). El capítulo sienta las bases de la teoría de la estructura argumental e incluye las definiciones e implicaciones de los conceptos clave desarrollados en el marco de esta teoría, tales como la incorporación (merge), la selección argumental

2
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines319 - : In order to account for these facts and for the interpretation of other indefinites, Diesing (1992) and Kratzer (1995) propose that the semantic IL/SL distinction follows from differences in argument structure. Specifically, Kratzer (1995) argues that Diesing´s (1992) proposal that subjects of ILPs and SLPs may be in different syntactic positions is a consequence of a difference in argument structure: SLPs have an extra argument position for events or spatio-temporal locations while ILPs do not . They both assume Heim´s (1982) proposal that i) indefinites are open formulas that contain a free variable that undergoes an operation of existential closure and ii) that sentences are mapped to a tripartite Logical Form that consists of a quantifier, a restrictive clause and a nuclear scope. For Diesing (1992) material from the VP is mapped into the nuclear scope where the variable undergoes existential closure while the material from the IP is mapped into a restrictive clause and, if there is not

3
paper corpusSignosTxtLongLines469 - : Grammatical PSM have not been as thoroughly examined as the lexical CSs. In fact, devices such as grammatical substitution have not been included in most of the taxonomies proposed so far with the exception of ^[120]Dӧrnyei and Kormos’ (1998). This subcategory is related to “the insufficient knowledge of the grammatical form and the argument structure of the lemma, as well as the word-ordering rules of the L2” and thus entails “changing certain grammatical specifications of the lemma through transfer or overgeneralisation” (^[121]Dӧrnyei & Kormos’, 1998: 357-361 ). This CS, within C1, was more often employed by the learners in the open task where they tended to transfer some structures from their L1 or overgeneralise an L2 grammatical construction.

Evaluando al candidato argument structure:


1) grammatical: 5 (*)
2) teoría: 3
3) lexical: 3 (*)
4) mapped: 3
5) hale: 3

argument structure
Lengua: spa
Frec: 29
Docs: 13
Nombre propio: / 29 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario: 2
Puntaje: 2.875 = (2 + (1+4.16992500144231) / (1+4.90689059560852)));
Candidato aceptado

Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término

(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)
argument structure
: Ambridge, B. & Blything, R. P. (2016). A connectionist model of the retreat from verb argument structure overgeneralization. Journal of Child Language, 43(6), 1245-1276. [93]https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000915000586
: Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity: Evidence From Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Espinal, T. & Mateu, J. (2011). Bare nominals and argument structure in Catalan and Spanish. The Linguistic Review, 28, 1-39.
: Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions. A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago/Londres: The University of Chicago Press.
: Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
: Hale, K. & Keyser, S. (1993). On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. En K. Hale & S. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20^th (pp. 53-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: Hale, K. & Keyser, S. (2000). Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
: Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. En K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 53-109). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press .
: Jezek, E. & Pustejovsky, J. (2017). Dynamic argument structure, LiLT, 15, 3.
: Luzondo, A. & Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2015). Argument structure constructions in a Natural Language Processing environment. Language Sciences, 48(2015), 70-89.
: Marantz, A. (2013). Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua, 130, 152-168.
: Mateu, J. (2002). Argument structure. Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. Tesis doctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España.
: Van Trijp, R. (2011). A design pattern for argument structure constructions. In L. Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 115-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
: Walton, D. (1996). Argument structure. A pragmatic theory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.